|
'The Next Pope' book
by Anura Guruge
Errata
Revision 1: August 19, 2010.
All of the errors found prior to August 19, 2010 fixed.
Errors in first
print, prior to August 19, 2010
-
Page 227, 9th line down:
2 typos on the same line.
It must have been a bad day. Sorry. I basically typed in 4 wrong
letters, but they totally changed 2 word. Sorry.
The Jesuits were suppressed in
1773
NOT 1733 as stated. Typo. Sorry.
Pius VII
(#252) not Paul VII (#252) restored them. Big typo. Sorry. But, at
least I got the index number, #252 right. Not sure what happened
that day.
To get a printable, CORRECTED page, as a PDF, that you can insert
into the book please click <here>
or on the page image on right (>>). Thank you.
This error was spotted by my friend Byron Hoover on March 2, 2010.
Thank YOU, Byron. You are THE best.
-
Page 21, 2nd para, 3rd line:
Clement XIV being the only pope to suppress a religious order.
Appears not to be the case. In 1571 Pius V suppressed the Humiliati.
I didn't know that. Sorry. This was pointed out by papal expert 'Dewie'
Schmerguls. Thank YOU Dewie. March 14, 2010.
-
Page 92, last para, 2nd line:
But Otto II died in December 1983.
Oops. That would have made him quite old. SORRY. Make that 983. No
excuses, but this might be due to an autocorrect by Word.
-
Page 115, 7th line from the bottom & Page 127 line 2:
'per the date of episcopal consecration' should instead now read
'per the date of becoming a cardinal bishop'.
[Same sentence, in the same context, on both pages.]
Of all of my goof ups, this
is the one I feel least bad about. It was due to a translation
error, from Latin to English, in the 1913 Catholic Encyclopedia. I
was just going by what was stated in the Encyclopedia. In May 2010,
three months after the book was published, I had to look into
precedence among cardinal bishops to determine which of the then
under-80 cardinal bishops would deputize for the Dean. After a month
of scrambling around I finally discovered the translation error --
thanks to a 'friend' in Italy who retranslated the Latin. You can
read the whole story <here>.
Well, at
least I fixed an error that had gone undetected for 96 years!
So cut me
some slack. << smile >>
-
Page 137, 8th line:
1880 should be 1800.
Typo. Sorry. If it was indeed 1880 it would have been a conclave
that lasted 80 years! << smile >> This too was pointed out by papal
expert 'Dewie' Schmerguls. Thank YOU Dewie.
March 14,
2010.
-
Page 185, 1st line
of the table:
'# Popes' 255
Typo. Sorry. That should be 265. Sorry.
-
Page 202, 15th line:
1803 should be 1831.
Typo. Sorry. This too was pointed out by papal expert 'Dewie'
Schmerguls. Thank YOU Dewie.
March 14,
2010.
-
Page 207, 3rd line:
Benedictus Sextus
should in fact be
Benedictus Sextus Decimus.
Missed the 'decimus' for ten. So I have him as the 6th rather than
16th. Sorry.Yet again by papal expert 'Dewie' Schmerguls. Thank YOU
Dewie.
March 14,
2010.
-
Page 212, 8th line from bottom: 'two
hundred' should in fact
have been 1317!
I changed paradigms in mid-sentence! I was talking years BUT was
thinking intervening popes -- which is another metric I use. Two
hundred popes, indeed a record, between Pius I and II. In terms of
years, it is 1317. Real sorry.Yet again by papal expert 'Dewie'
Schmerguls. Thank YOU Dewie.
March 14,
2010.
-
Page 266, 3rd last paragraph:
When I said Paul VI I meant Pius XII!
'Cut-and-paste' nightmare. This was the conclave that elected Pius
XII not Paul VI. So when talking about the electee I meant Pius XII.
Sorry. Yet another by papal expert 'Dewie' Schmerguls. Thank YOU
Dewie.
March 14,
2010.
-
Page 294, Pius XI entry:
'ordained a priest during the papacy of Pius X'. Change that to
'while he was the Domestic Prelate to Pius X'.
I could, if I was that way
inclined,
bluff my
way out of this and possibly even claim that I was just repeating
what the pope, i.e., Pius X, is SUPPOSED to have said. But, I won't.
I should have checked (especially since the pope was not talking
ex cathedra! << smile >>). He actually became a priest in 1879
-- two decades ahead of Pius X. Maybe he did mean 'Domestic Prelate'
and that got misinterpreted. It could have been another translation
error from the Latin. Does not matter.
We now know that this statement was in error.
-
Numerous other typos such as 'alter' for 'altar,' 'formally' for
'formerly' etc. SORRY. This book was proofed by up to four
proofreaders! But, it is still MY FAULT. Sorry. I will try to do
better next time, but I can't promise. I 'write' too fast. <smile> 'Dewie'
Schmerguls pointed out about 17 of these! Thank YOU Dewie.
March 14,
2010.
 |
|
To contact Anura Guruge.
email:
anu@wownh.com
cell:
1-603-455-0901
[my cell phone, however, is not attached to me. I am well known
for not knowing where my cell phone is. But don't despair. I
will get back.]
Webs:
www.guruge.com
&
www.wownh.com |
|